Project Management Project Improvement Process

Question: Discuss about the Project Management for Project Improvement Process. Answer: Introduction: Different research implies that the developed knowledge management system helps the efficiency and accuracy of a consultancy. The critical success factors will help to evaluate the organizational culture including its value and contribution factors (Baskerville and Wood-Harper 2016). Different methods are used by various organizations in order to improve the consultancy project methods. There are certain approaches used for the improvement of the consultancies. The methods that must be followed in order to improve the consulting projects are as follows: Thinking process: If the project development team is not aware of the method to be used then they must learn it properly to deal with the clients (Keller and Heiko 2014). The practical values of the thinking processes are embedded within the methods only thus; they must acquire appropriate tools to adopt expertise solutions for overall organizational benefits. The phrase that implies the process properly says that consultancy experts do not like to learn rather they like to use different tools to improve the project development process (Lappe and Spang 2014). Many real-life examples are found that utilizes lesser time and large improvement in the project management. Facilitating competencies: This particular method of project management serves for both new as well as expert consultants. This method includes both the beginners and the experts. The beginners must follow the process in step by step to avoid execution error. Proper level of competencies and necessary performance management is required to be adopted by the development team (Schwalbe 2015). On the other hand, the experts should evolve certain innovation methods to improve the project organized for the organization. This kid thinking process provides valuable refreshers and prior to the competencies. Reusability of the objectives: In order to develop the building blocks reusability of the learning objects are strictly required for those experts who provides redesigning approaches and training to the employees working for the consultancy (Mir and Pinnington 2014). Sometimes, it is also found that more than one method are taken together and structured in a proper sequence to accomplish the objectives of the organization. Formal usage of the method: The formal usability of the methods most of the times evokes the responses that must be obtained from the consumers of the organizations (Hornstein 2015). A formal approach will give opportunities to the clients and to the organization also. In order to make a better management system in the consultancies tools of the trades are needed to be adopted. The facilities long with competencies serve both the methods of novice s well as experts. The formal utilization of different methods also includes many responses of the clients. The nature of the assignments and projects developed by the corporate organization maintains many models for process and knowledge management improvement (Braglia and Frosolini 2014). This process needs organizational tangibility and intact interaction among the domain of process management. There are some resources used to enhance the efficiency of a system. The resources include: Evaluation of strengths and limitations of each methods Strengths: During evaluation it has been found that these methods will help to avoid risk occurrences in the consultancies. Rather it will increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the project developed for an organization. The creative evaluation will increase the external and internal communication system (Baskerville and Wood-Harper 2016). Limitations: Over burden is limitation of thinking process. While implementing Knowledge management system, efforts according to the time is a major limitation. Facilitating competencies Strengths: The mechanistic approach and organizational culture include in the improvement methods will help to identify or detect the errors and the proper flow of communication will also help to utilize the knowledge management system. Limitations: Quality of knowledge is the main limitation in this process. In order to frame a proper project for a consultancy the quality of knowledge of the employees working for the project is required to be enough so that they could form an error free and advanced project. Reusability of the objectives Strengths: Same object can be used for different purposes and it will help to increase the efficiency of a project. Limitations: Lack of leadership will lead to improper application of same objects. The quality of the leader is needed to be effective so that they can well manage the overall system. Proper business process improvement is another major issue. Formal usage of method Strengths: Formal usability of applicable methods in proper project innovations does not require extreme knowledge and this method can be used with limited cost. The time required to implement this method is also lesser than others. Limitations: Process issue is the major limitation of the process. Braglia and Frosolini (2014) stated that, knowledge creation and its utilization in business are needed. Improper synchronization is a limitation t this process. References Baskerville, R.L. and Wood-Harper, A.T., 2016. A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. InEnacting Research Methods in Information Systems: Volume 2(pp. 169-190). Springer International Publishing. Braglia, M. and Frosolini, M., 2014. An integrated approach to implement project management information systems within the extended enterprise.International Journal of Project Management,32(1), pp.18-29. Hornstein, H.A., 2015. The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity.International Journal of Project Management,33(2), pp.291-298. Keller, J. and Heiko, A., 2014. The influence of information and communication technology (ICT) on future foresight processesResults from a Delphi survey.Technological Forecasting and Social Change,85, pp.81-92. Lappe, M. and Spang, K., 2014. Investments in project management are profitable: A case study-based analysis of the relationship between the costs and benefits of project management.International Journal of Project Management,32(4), pp.603-612. Mir, F.A. and Pinnington, A.H., 2014. Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success.International Journal of Project Management,32(2), pp.202-217. Schwalbe, K., 2015.Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.